Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Drug Investig ; 42(10): 807-812, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2027720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The enduring presence of COVID-19 and subsequent increasing incidence of COVID-19 reinfection has prompted evaluation of associated risk factors, particularly the role of immunosuppression. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize cases indicative of COVID-19 reinfection with respect to their reported use of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study leveraged the Pfizer global safety database (SDB) containing adverse event data collected in association with use of Pfizer products between 1 October 2019, and 30 June 2022. Selected Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Preferred Terms were used to identify COVID-19 cases; the search was further refined to comprise cases that subsequently reported events potentially indicative of COVID-19 reinfection. RESULTS: Of the cumulative total of 218,242 COVID-19 cases reported into the SDB, 4590 cases (2.1%) involving potential COVID-19 reinfection were identified. Of these 4590 cases of potential Covid-19 reinfection, a total of 134 cases reported COVID-19 specifically during treatment with pharmaceutical products, of which approximately 16% (21/134) of cases reported use of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents. Likewise, in the overall dataset (213,652 cases; excluding the 4590 cases involving potential COVID-19 recurrence), the percentage of reported immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents was low (12%). In applying similar parameters to a dataset that excludes COVID-19 vaccine cases, 18% of cases reported use of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents (similar to the aforementioned 16% of cases reported from the overall total dataset that was inclusive of vaccine cases). CONCLUSION: This pharmacovigilance study provides a characterization of cases indicative of COVID-19 reinfection with respect to reported use of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents. The observations generated from this cross-sectional observational analysis may prompt further research into the role of immunosuppression in COVID-19 reinfection, in an effort to better inform clinical practice and patient management.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores , Inmunosupresores , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Reinfección/epidemiología
3.
Indian J Pharmacol ; 53(5): 394-402, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1547558

RESUMEN

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is spreading like wildfire with no specific recommended treatment in sight. While some risk factors such as the presence of comorbidities, old age, and ethnicity have been recognized, not a lot is known about who the virus will strike first or impact more. In this hopeless scenario, exploration of time-tested facts about viral infections, in general, seems to be a sound basis to prop further research upon. The fact that immunity and its various determinants (e.g., micronutrients, sleep, and hygiene) have a crucial role to play in the defense against invading organisms, may be a good starting point for commencing research into these as yet undisclosed territories. Herein, the excellent immunomodulatory, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory roles of Vitamin D necessitate thorough investigation, particularly in COVID-19 perspective. This article reviews mechanisms and evidence suggesting the role Vitamin D plays in people infected by the newly identified COVID-19 virus. For this review, we searched the databases of Medline, PubMed, and Embase. We studied several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials evaluating the role of Vitamin D in influenza and other contagious viral infections. We also reviewed the circumstantial and anecdotal evidence connecting Vitamin D with COVID-19 emerging recently. Consequently, it seems logical to conclude that the immune-enhancing, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and lung-protective role of Vitamin D can be potentially lifesaving. Hence, Vitamin D deserves exhaustive exploration through rigorously designed and controlled scientific trials. Using Vitamin D as prophylaxis and/or chemotherapeutic treatment of COVID-19 infection is an approach worth considering. In this regard, mass assessment and subsequent supplementation can be tried, especially considering the mechanistic evidence in respiratory infections, low potential for toxicity, and widespread prevalence of the deficiency of Vitamin D affecting many people worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Inmunidad/efectos de los fármacos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/uso terapéutico , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/virología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Pulmón/inmunología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Pulmón/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/efectos adversos , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/inmunología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatología , Vitaminas/efectos adversos
4.
Mucosal Immunol ; 15(2): 198-210, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1493071

RESUMEN

As the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, and considering the lack of efficacy of antiviral strategies to this date, and the reactive hyperinflammation leading to tissue lesions and pneumonia, effective treatments targeting the dysregulated immune response are more than ever required. Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs have been repurposed in severe COVID-19 with contrasting results. The heterogeneity in the timing of treatments administrations could be accountable for these discrepancies. Indeed, many studies included patients at different timepoints of infection, potentially hiding the beneficial effects of a time-adapted intervention. We aim to review the available data on the kinetics of the immune response in beta-coronaviruses infections, from animal models and longitudinal human studies, and propose a four-step model of severe COVID-19 timeline. Then, we discuss the results of the clinical trials of immune interventions with regards to the timing of administration, and finally suggest a time frame in order to delineate the best timepoint for each treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/terapia , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Esquema de Medicación , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Int Immunol ; 33(12): 787-790, 2021 11 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1398105

RESUMEN

Dysbiosis is alterations in the microbial composition compared with a healthy microbiota and often features a reduction in gut microbial diversity and a change in microbial taxa. Dysbiosis, especially in the gut, has also been proposed to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and multiple sclerosis. A body of evidence has shown that intestinal polymeric immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies are important to regulate the gut microbiota as well as to exclude pathogenic bacteria or viral infection such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) at mucosal sites. Since the 1970s, trials for oral administration of therapeutic IgA or IgG have been performed mainly to treat infectious enteritis caused by pathogenic Escherichia coli or Clostridium difficile. However, few of them have been successfully developed for clinical application up to now. In addition to the protective function against intestinal pathogens, IgA is well known to modulate the gut commensal microbiota leading to symbiosis. Nevertheless, the development of therapeutic IgA drugs to treat dysbiosis is not progressing. In this review, the advantages of therapeutic IgA antibodies and the problems for their development will be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunoglobulina A/uso terapéutico , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Intestinos/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Bacterias/inmunología , Disbiosis , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/efectos adversos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/microbiología , Intestinos/inmunología , Intestinos/microbiología , Especificidad de la Especie
6.
J Dev Orig Health Dis ; 13(1): 9-19, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1046039

RESUMEN

Medical care is predicated on 'do no harm', yet the urgency to find drugs and vaccines to treat or prevent COVID-19 has led to an extraordinary effort to develop and test new therapies. Whilst this is an essential cornerstone of a united global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the absolute requirements for meticulous efficacy and safety data remain. This is especially pertinent to the needs of pregnant women; a group traditionally poorly represented in drug trials, yet a group at heightened risk of unintended adverse materno-fetal consequences due to the unique physiology of pregnancy and the life course implications of fetal or neonatal drug exposure. However, due to the complexities of drug trial participation when pregnant (be they vaccines or therapeutics for acute disease), many clinical drug trials will exclude them. Clinicians must determine the best course of drug treatment with a dearth of evidence from either clinical or preclinical studies, where at least in the short term they may be more focused on the outcome of the mother than of her offspring.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/inmunología , Femenino , Feto/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/efectos adversos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Intercambio Materno-Fetal , Madres , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA